I have a slim bookshelf of plague fiction. It's an
unsettling corner of my library, one that shines a light on human self-interest
and indifference. Of course there's Camus' Plague and
Saragamo's Blindness. The Flame Alphabet shares a lot with
these books - like them, it is full of things from the world we know.
Telephones and copper wires. Cars, houses, trees, and children. But it also
contains things that are not of this world - mysterious illnesses that stem
from children's speech, holes in the woods that carry sermons to lonely
worshippers.
As a work of largely experimental fiction (it's encouraging
and a little hard to believe how many mainstream outlets blurbed the book),
The Flame Alphabet suffers from a certain almost autistic
emotional coolness. I found this much more readable than Marcus' earlier
book, The Age of Wire and String, in part because the author does an
astonishing job capturing the confusing, destructive love of parenting.
Characters labor in ignorance long after you know what's causing their illness,
and when ignorance no longer serves, they turn to denial for comfort.
For me, the passages in which the book treats language as a
real thing are most engaging. For much of the second part of
the book, we see minute descriptions of the act and effects of writing. These
are captivating, and one begins to see the world slightly differently. The
proliferation of signs and messages in the semiosphere takes on a quality of
menace. William S. Burroughs described language as a virus and Marcus carries
that idea to an extreme point, giving readers a world in which symbiosis is no
longer the routine and where overexposure has catastrophic consequences.
What do we get from reading plague literature? From Camus, I
got a strange reassurance of the agency and fundamental goodness of mankind.
From Saragamo, I got horror - a sense of how we are ultimately wired to take
advantage of any situation. From Marcus, I get a sense of the destructive power
of love, of our unwillingness to leave a toxic situation long after it has
begun to kill us. I could wish for an ending to the book, and for the
resolution of many of its open questions about the motivations and outcomes of
characters' actions, but I am satisfied with what I got: a thoughtful
consideration of language, an allegory of parental misery, and a chance to ask
myself, in a disaster like the plague described here, who which one of these
characters would I be?
No comments:
Post a Comment